Wallace attempted to get BLOTUS to “give a direct answer” on whether he would accept the Nov. 3 election results or not. The response? “I have to see. Look, you — I have to see. No, I’m not going to just say ‘yes.’ I’m not going to say no and I didn’t last time either,”
I expected nothing less.
But "journalists" being what they are these days did not do the obvious follow-up.
Follow-ups, actually. Plural.
Since the Obese president didn't quite answer and since Wallace didn't quite say, "if the results said you lost....." (though that was the inference) the seemingly obvious first follow up should have been:
"So, if the electorate says you won, you're saying you might not accept those results?"
Since the man is an egomaniac, naturally he would have said 'yes, he'd accept those results".
The second follow-up, would / should have been, "so with the same election, same parameters, same everything, why would you be so good with one set of results and not the other?".
Then we'd get to watch the fat fuck flounder (I do love alliteration).
But none of that happened........except in my mind. Missed opportunities.
Song by: Daryl Hall + John Oates