Wednesday, January 30, 2019
I'm thinking now. I think his communication is outbound only. If it's not about him, why even bother, right?
The problem I find with folks who do respond to him is they don't use the @BLOTUS so it not only goes back to his account, but to everyone who follows that buffoon. Make sure they all get the message.
Case in point - look to your left.
It's a great response. Period.
Those who allege to be Christian can't even argue with this. It's true.
Well, as true as one book can be, I suppose. But since said Christians use the bible as their life manual - except when it's not convenient for their current / past / future behaviour - if any of them tried to slam the responder, what could possibly be their rationale?
BLOTUS committing adultery isn't an alternative fact. It's just a fact. Much like the rules for haircare are simple and finite, so are the laws of the bible.
Of course, people cherry pick the parts of the bible they want to be believe or go by - so I'm assuming that is why evangelicals and the likes will say that part of the book is outdated. ....but the gay thing is not. It's why planting certain crops side by side is outdated. .....but the gay thing is not. Can't touch the skin of a pig is outdated. .....but the gay thing is not. A woman being silent in church is outdated. ....but the gay thing is not. (I could really keep this going for days, but I won't.)
Still, I love Rabia's response........whomever she may be.
Song by: Ghost